Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioners to consider pending representation in light of Government Resolution dated 21st September, 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1872.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1872 OF 2023
Sahebchand Uttamchand Jain and others
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri A. R. Sayed, Advocate h/f Shri Sushil P. Pandit, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Shri P. K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ. DATE : 06TH MARCH, 2023.
FINAL ORDER :
. On instructions prayer is made for withdrawal of the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, representation if any pending with the respondents be considered in the light of the Government Resolution dated 21st September, 2012.
[ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.]
[NITIN W. SAMBRE , J.]
bsb/March 23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahebchand Uttamchand Jain
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
S. G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
