Criminal writ petition dismissed as there is nothing remaining for disposal after the State CID indicated the petitioner need not appear at their office.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
25-wp-1830.22.doc
BIPINDHARMENDER Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2023.10.03 17:50:57 PRITHIANI +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1830 OF 2022
Shailesh Vijay Patil … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. S. T. Pandey a/w Nagesh Avhad, Anima Mishra, Anuj Singh and Kajal Upadhyay i/by SBG Law for the Petitioner. Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 3 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. Learned APP, on written instructions of Mr Dilip Gade, Deputy Superintendent of Police, State CID, submitted that the petitioner need not to attend the office of the State CID any more in this connection. The communication is taken on record and marked as Exhibit ‘X’ for identification.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Shailesh Vijay Patil
State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
