Petitioners sought to lodge a crime based on complaints filed with police authorities who had not taken cognizance. Counsel for the petitioner requested leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:31610-DB
Osk 47-Wp-1826-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1826 OF 2023
Ravindra Nivrutti Adhav & Anr.
… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr.K.R. Tiwari i/b.K R Tiwari And Co. for Petitioners. Mrs.S.D. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 17th October 2023.
P.C. :
India the Petitioner is seeking lodgment of the crime on the basis of his complaints dated 5th December 2022 and 12th January 2023, on which the concerned Police Authorities have not taken cognizance.
1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra Nivrutti Adhav & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
A. S. Gadkari
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
