In a writ petition, all disputes between parties were amicably settled via consent terms tendered and taken on record, leading to the disposal of the petition.
Writ Petition disposed of in view of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kishor 1/1 903 wp 1669 of 22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1669 OF 2022
Shree Sai Realty Thr. Partners & Ors. … Petitioner Versus Vijaykumar Sahebrao Babar & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, a/w. Mr. Gaurav Shahare, Mr. Krush Jaybhay for Petitioner.
Mr. Ajit Kenjale, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. Sarthak Diwan, for Respondent No.4. Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for Respondent-State.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2023.
P. C.:
Mr. Diwan, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.4 would submit that he would file Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos.4 within a period of one week from today.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
KISHOR Digitally signedby KISHOR VISHNU VISHNU KAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2023.10.2111:47:08 +0530
Shree Sai Realty Thr. Partners & Ors.
Vijaykumar Sahebrao Babar & Ors.
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
