Dismissed

Sandeep Gulab Chinchwade v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Ministry of Co-Operation , and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Dec 2023WP/15898/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay dismissed two writ petitions challenging a Recovery Certificate issued by the Registrar under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Relying on precedent regarding the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 154(2A), the Court found no warrant for Article 226 interference.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petitions dismissed with no order as to costs.

Sandeep Gulab Chinchwade Vs State of Maharashtra through Its… — Money Laundering | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

38 & 39. WP 15898-2023 (common order).doc Anand

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 15898 OF 2023

¶4

Sandeep Gulab Chinchwade .Petitioner

¶5

Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, .Respondents Ministry of Co-operation & ors.

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 15899 OF 2023

M/s. Om Sai Travels

.Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondents through its Secretary, Ministry of Co-operation & Ors.

¶13

______________________________________________________________ Ms. Minal Chandnani a/w. Zaheb Merchant i/b. Jaiwant S. Chandnani Associates, Advocate, for the Petitioners Ms. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP, for the Respondent – State Mr. Harish R. Pawar a/w. Ms. Charusheela S. Garad, Advocate, for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6

¶14

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 20.12.2023

¶15

P. C.

¶16

1 . Heard Ms. Chandnani, learned Counsel appearing for

¶17

the Petitioners, Ms. Nimbalkar, learned AGP appearing for the Respondent – State and Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel appearing for

¶18

Respondent Nos. 5 & 6.

¶19

Page 1 of 3

¶20

38 & 39. WP 15898-2023 (common order).doc Anand

¶21

2 . By the present Writ Petitions fled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are inter alia challenging the legality and validity of the Order dated 19th March 2021 (“ impugned Order ”) passed under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (“ MCS Act ”) in Case No. 1123 of 2019.

¶22

3 . Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 states that the Petitioner has fled the Revision only with regards to the Attachment Notice dated 03.08.2021 and not with regards to the Recovery Certifcate issued under Section 101 of the MCS Act.

¶23

4 . In this particular case, Recovery Certifcate issued is for more than Rs.6,00,00,000/- (Rupees Six Crores Only). Mr. Pawar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 states that the outstanding dues and recoverable amount is Rs.11,50,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven Crore and Fifty Lakh Only).

¶24

A learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Greater Bombay Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Dhillon P. Shah ,

¶25

Page 2 of 3

¶26

38 & 39. WP 15898-2023 (common order).doc Anand

¶27

reported in 2003 SCC OnLine Bom 953 has held that the provisions of Sub Section 2A of Section 154 of the MCS Act will apply even to the derivative action taken pursuant to the Recovery Certifcate issued under Section 101 of the MCS Act for recovery of the outstanding amount. Sub Section 2A of Section 154 of the MCS Act provides that no Application for Revision shall be entertained against the Recovery Certifcate issued by the Registrar under Section 101 of the MCS Act unless the Applicant deposits ffty percent (50%) amount of the total amount of recoverable dues with the concerned Society.

¶28

6 . Therefore, this is not a case where any interference

¶29

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is warranted.

¶30

7 . Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed in above

¶31

terms with no order as to costs.

¶32

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)

¶33

Page 3 of 3

Sandeep Gulab Chinchwade v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Ministry of Co-Operation , and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Gulab Chinchwade v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Ministry of Co-Operation , and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Hiralal Gandhi Vs District Deputy Registrar Co-Op.Societies and Ors.

Janardan S. Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Ramchandra Shivram Dhotre Since Decd. Thr Legal Ehers Vs State of Maha. Thr. Gp and Ors.

Suresh Parshuram Joshi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through District Dy. Registrar, Thane and Ors.

Balvinder Singh Harbans Singh Gujral Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Hanumant Nivrutti Yadav Vs the District Magistrate and Collector , Solapur and Ors.