Disposed

Suresh Thau Rathod v. the Collector and District Magistrate Solapur and Anr.

Bombay HC22 Dec 2023WP/15609/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition addressed the grievance that a statutory appeal filed before the Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, remained pending for three months. The Court directed the Additional Chief Secretary to decide the appeal by February 16, 2024, without considering merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.2 to dispose of the pending statutory appeal filed by the Petitioner on or before 16th February 2024.

Suresh Thau Rathod Vs the Collector and District… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

7-wp-15609-2023.doc
Sonali

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.15609 OF 2023

¶4

Suresh Thau Rathod
Sole Proprietor of
M/s. Sukh Sagar Restaurant and Bar...Petitioner
 Versus
The Collector and District Magistrate,
Solapur & Anr....Respondents

¶5

Mrs. Veena Thadhani, for the Petitioner.

¶6

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP, for the State/Respondents.

¶7

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 22^nd DECEMBER 2023

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1.It is the grievance of the Petitioner that statutory Appeal along
with Stay Application which has been filed before the Respondent
No.2-Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya,
Mumbai is not considered for last about three months.

¶10

2.Ms. Thadhani, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner
states that Petitioner’s business is closed in view of the impugned
Order, which is challenged by filing Appeal.

¶11

1/2

¶12

7-wp-15609-2023.doc
Sonali

¶13

3. After taking instructions, Mr. Sawant, learned AGP appearing

¶14

for the State/Respondents states that the said statutory Appeal will be decided on or before 16^th February 2024.

¶15

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the Respondent No.2-Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai to dispose of the pending Appeal filed by the Petitioner on or before 16^th February 2024.

¶16

5. It is clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and

¶17

all contentions on merits are expressly kept open.

¶18

 [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶19

2/2

Suresh Thau Rathod v. the Collector and District Magistrate Solapur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Thau Rathod v. the Collector and District Magistrate Solapur and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khan Amina Khatun (Jai Ambe Hardware) Decd. Thr Khan Farhan Ahmed Ajaz Ahmed Vs Apex Grievances Redressal Committee and Ors.

Paschim Maharashtra Education Trust and Anr. Vs Tabassum Anwar Shaikh and Ors.

Paschim Maharashtra Education Trust and Anr. Vs Tabassum Anwar Shaikh and Ors.

Smt. Ashalata Prabodh Kolhatkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Baburao Bhimsha Birajdar Vs State of Maharashtra

Pravin Shamrao Patil and Ors. Vs Joint Charity Commissioner Kolhapur Division and Ors.