The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a writ petition alleging infringement of private law rights. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal citing maintainability concerns. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.12.14 17:41:24 +0530
1 (11) WP-15319.23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.15319 OF 2023
M/s. Shailee Enterprises Through its authorized Partner Ramanlal Kishandas Kothari & anr. : Petitioners Vs.
The Union of India and ors. : Respondents.
Ms. Sandhya Maniyar i/by Mr. A. S. Raktade for the Petitioners. Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP a/w Mr. M. M. Pabale, for the State.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
Petitioners.
Petition, which primarily alleges infringement of private law
rights of the Petitioners, is maintainable, learned counsel for the
Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to
the Petitioners to take any other legal recourse for redressal of
1 of 2
LGC
2 (11) WP-15319.23.doc
their grievances.
3 The present Writ Petition is thus dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
LGC
M/s. Shailee Enterprises Through its authorized Partner Ramanlal Kishandas Kothari & anr.
The Union of India and ors.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
