The High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by a woman against her husband. The court allowed withdrawal as the parties settled disputes by filing a mutual consent divorce petition.
Both writ petitions disposed of as infructuous upon grant of liberty to withdraw after mutual consent divorce.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
18 - WP 492 OF 2020.doc
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINODMAYEKAR MAYEKARDate: 2023.12.0211:51:11 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 492 OF 2020 Alka Sachin Borate & Anr. ….. Petitioners VERSUS Sachin Shankar Borate & Anr. ….. Respondents
ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1466 OF 2021 Alka Sachin Borate & Anr. ….. Petitioners VERSUS Sachin Shankar Borate ….. Respondent
Mr.Anand S.Patil for the Petitioners in both the Writ Petitions. Mr.Girish R.Agrawal for the Respondent No.1 in both Writ Petitions. Ms.S.S.Kaushik, APP for the State.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 30th NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C. :-
Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his clients seeks liberty to withdraw both these writ petitions as the parties have settled their disputes and are living separately by filing mutually consent divorce petition, which was allowed.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Alka Sachin Borate & Anr.
Sachin Shankar Borate & Anr.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
