No substantive proposition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner seeking leave to withdraw it before the relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1447 OF 2023
SHIVLING GURLING HAMNE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. H. I. Pathan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, APP for the respondent/State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 25th OCTOBER, 2023
P.C. :-
petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
ssp
1 of 1
944.criwp1447.23.odt
Shivling Gurling Hamne
State of Maharashtra
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
