Disposed

Kapil Tanajirao Biradar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC7 Feb 2023WP/1446/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court on February 7, 2023, disposed of five writ petitions seeking decisions on pending proposals for transferring petitioners from unaided to aided posts. The respondents undertook to complete scrutiny within four months, with a deadline set for May 15, 2023.

What did the court decide?

The petitions were disposed of with an expectation that the proposals be decided, by following due procedure, on or before 15.05.2023.

Kapil Tanajirao Biradar Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

wp1443.23-

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

109 WRIT PETITION NO.1443 OF 2023

¶5

SHIVKUMAR VAIJNATHAPPA RAMSHETTE VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶7

AND

¶8

110 WRIT PETITION NO.1444 OF 2023

¶9

PRAKASH RAMCHANDRA SHINDE

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶12

AND

¶13

111 WRIT PETITION NO.1445 OF 2023

¶14

MADHAV HANMANTRAO SUNDALE

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶17

AND

¶18

112 WRIT PETITION NO.1446 OF 2023

¶19

KAPIL TANAJIRAO BIRADAR

¶20

VERSUS

¶21

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶22

AND

¶23

113 WRIT PETITION NO.1447 OF 2023

¶24

SANTOSH HANMANTRAO BIRADAR

¶25

VERSUS

¶26

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶27

AND

¶28

114 WRIT PETITION NO.1448 OF 2023

¶29

GANGADHAR GANPATRAO PATIL RAMSHETTE

wp1443.23-

-2-

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶34

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V.D. Gunale AGPs for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. P.S. Patil and Mr. V.M. Kagne

¶35

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 7^th FEBRUARY, 2023.

¶36

PER COURT :-

¶37

The learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the proposals for transferring the petitioners from unaided to the aided post are pending with respondent No.2. The petitioners pray that the said proposals be decided within a time frame.

¶38

The learned A.G.P. appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that respondent No.2 would decide each of the proposals after performing individual scrutiny and assessment in accordance with the law applicable and in the light of the record available. He submits that this exercise would be completed within four (04) months.

¶39

In view of the above, these petitions are disposed off. We expect, respondent No.2 to consider these proposals in accordance with law and the policies applicable, by following the due procedure and arrive at an independent decision, in each case, on or before 15.05.2023.

¶40

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.)

¶41

rlj/

Kapil Tanajirao Biradar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kapil Tanajirao Biradar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranita Namdev Shingare Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Datta Pandurang Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Digambar Baburao Mule Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Sanjay Dhanraj Mahajan Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Jagannath Uttamrao Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Others

Shivanand Kashinath Malbhage Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Others