Petitioner sought leave to withdraw criminal writ petition against impugned order under Section 156(3) CrPC. High Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to move a fresh application.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to resort to second proviso to Section 156(3) CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
62 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.143 OF 2023
ANAND KASHIRAM SAPKALE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Sumeet A. Sapkale APP for Respondent : Mr.M.M.Nerlikar
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. Dated: March 20, 2023
...
PER COURT :-
. Learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with a liberty to resort to the second proviso of State Amendment to Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
( M. M. SATHAYE, J. ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. )
SPT
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ANAND KASHIRAM SAPKALE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
M. M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
