Bhaskar S/O. Pandharinath Kurwade v. Shrikant S/O. Sarjerao Ugalmogale
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.143 OF 2019
BHASKAR S/O. PANDHARINATH KURWADE VERSUS SHRIKANT S/O. SARJERAO UGALMOGALE
Mr. V. P. Savant, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Rani r. Tandale, Advocate hf/ Mr. S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the respondent
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C. :-
1 of 2
914.cirwp143.19.odt
presentation/filing of the said complaint and application was filed for condonation of delay. The said application came to be contested also.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
ssp
2 of 2
914.cirwp143.19.odt
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of the Learned JMFC refusing to condone the delay in presentation of the complaint.
Whether the requirement for condonation of delay applies when a complaint presented after Supreme Court directions is deemed timely.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhaskar S/o. Pandharinath Kurwade
Shrikant S/o. Sarjerao Ugmogale
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court