This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 34 wp 1400.18 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1400 OF 2018
Devisingh Balasaheb Deshmukh & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Advocate M.P. Kasar (Patil) & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Rajesh S. Jadhav, for Petitioners. Ms. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent No.3-State. Mr. Pratik B. Rahade, for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2023
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in respect of the impugned orders. Reserving the liberty so prayed for, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. All contentions on the merits of the matter are kept open.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
1/1
katkam
Devisingh Balasaheb Deshmukh
Advocate M.P. Kasar (Patil)
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
