Petitioner abandoned writ petition relying on Supreme Court precedent. Court disposed of the petition without further argument.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-WP-12791-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12791 OF 2022
Guala Closures India Pvt. Ltd.)...Petitioner
V/s.
Union of India and Others)...Respondents
Mr. D.H.Nadkarni a/w. Mr. C.S.Biradar i/b. M/s. Legal
Solutions, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. H.S.Venegaonkar, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 10 MARCH 2023
P.C.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that in light
of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of
India vs. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.1 the Petition does not
survive. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 162 (S.C.)
AVK 1/1
ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signedby ARTI VILASKHATATE Date: 2023.03.1512:06:56 +0530
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India vs. Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.Followed¶11
2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 162 (S.C.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Guala Closures India Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India
Nitin Jamdar
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court