This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-WP-12611-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12611 OF 2018
SHRI.VIJAY MADHAV VAIDYA)...PETITIONER
V/s.
SMT.KUSUM PRABHAKAR VAIDYA & ANR. )...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Sudhir Sadavarte, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Vrushal Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:7th JUNE 2023
P.C.:
1. The learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that Petition
has become infructuous. Accordingly, Petition stands disposed as
infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 1/1
ARTI VILAS KHATATE Digitally signed by ARTI VILASKHATATE Date: 2023.06.07 18:26:56 +0530
SHRI.VIJAY MADHAV VAIDYA
SMT.KUSUM PRABHAKAR VAIDYA
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court