Proposer-petitioner converter tenders the writ petition infructuous after the Director must cancel the tender and dismisses the application accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.12.06 18:35:24 +0530
1 (501) WP-12601.23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12601 OF 2023
Nandkumar Constructions : Petitioner. Versus The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department & ors. : Respondents.
Mr. Yuvraj Narwankar for the Petitioner.
Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP a/w Mr. M. M. Pable AGP for the Respondents/State.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 05th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
1 Learned counsel representing the Petitioner states
that the Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Satara has directed the Executive Engineer concerned to cancel
the tender, which is under challenged in this Writ Petition, and
therefore, the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous.
2 In view thereof, the present Writ Petition is dismissed
as having been rendered infructuous.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
LGC
Nandkumar Constructions
The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
