Writ petition challenging an order allowing amendment to a written statement was rejected as the amendment merely clarified an inadvertent mistake without changing the defense.
Writ petition rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA VIJAY VIJAY RAJGURU RAJGURU Date:2023.04.20 17:26:02+0530 7.wp-12466-2019.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12466 OF 2019
Sheikh Sahabuddin Abdul Hamid Sheikh … Petitioner
vs.
Ali Jarrar Siddiqui and Anr … Respondents
Mr. Ashutosh R. Gole, for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 13th APRIL, 2023
P.C. :-
no. 12. The proposed amendment, as reflected in the application for carrying out the amendment, seeks to clarify the averment made in
1/1
7.wp-12466-2019.doc
paragraph 12 of the written statement with respect to construction carried out by Plaintiff by adding that “it is not true to say that”. A perusal of the proposed amendment in paragraph 12 shows that it is only for correcting an inadvertent mistake.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
2/2
Sheikh Sahabuddin Abdul Hamid Sheikh
Ali Jarrar Siddiqui
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
