Writ petition challenging inclusion of a person in Enquiry Committee. Court directed respondent to decide pending representation within prescribed timeline.
Respondent No.3 to decide the representation by 28/02/2023 following due procedure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1128.23wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
914 WRIT PETITION NO.1128 OF 2023
SITARAM LAXMANRAO KAKADE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr Kishor Taur, Advocate h/f Mr V. A. Bagal, Advocate for petitioners; Mr S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for respondents/State
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 2nd February, 2023
PER COURT:
1128.23wp (2)
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
SITARAM LAXMANRAO KAKADE AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
