Dismissed

Kishor S/O Kantilal Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary Agriculture Animal Hunsbandry and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Feb 2023WP/1107/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner claimed an advertisement was issued contrary to a stay order. The court held there was no imminent apprehension as the matter was pending before the Tribunal with a hearing scheduled, allowing the petition to be dismissed without costs.

What did the court decide?

None. No costs awarded. Parties directed to appear before the Tribunal on 10th February 2023.

Kishor S/O Kantilal Gaikwad Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

8-WP-1107-2023

¶2

pdp

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1107 OF 2023

¶5

Kishor S/o Kantilal Gaikwad .. Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶8

Mr. Arvind G. Ambetkar for petitioner. Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for State.

¶9

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ. &

¶10

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶11

DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2023

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1. We have heard Mr. Ambetkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

2. It is submitted that the advertisement is issued after the order was passed in Original Application No. 260 of 2021 dated 5^th April, 2022. It is submitted that the said order dated 5^th April, 2022 in Original Application No. 260 of 2021 is stayed by the Aurangabad Bench by order dated 25^th January, 2023 in Civil Application No. 789 of 2023 in Writ Petition No. 5528 of 2022.

¶15

3. The matters are pending before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has only observed that the other side is also required to be heard as the matters are relating to recruitment rules and the learned AGP submits that now the matters are kept before the Tribunal on 10^th February, 2023.

¶16

4. In view of that, there is no eminent apprehension to the petitioner.

¶17

¶18

8-WP-1107-2023

¶19

5. The parties may appear before the Tribunal on 10^th February, 2023 and canvass their submissions.

¶20

6. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶21

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

Digitally signed byPRAVIN PRAVIN DASHARATH DASHARATH PANDIT PANDIT Date: 2023.02.01 19:54:46 +0530

¶23

Kishor S/O Kantilal Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary Agriculture Animal Hunsbandry and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishor S/O Kantilal Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary Agriculture Animal Hunsbandry and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham Sanjay Tilekar and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Amit Samadhan Palwe Vs Maharashtra State Electricity Dist Comp Ltd. Thr Its Chairman and Managing Director and Ors.

Kalyan Bagade Vs Union of India Thr. Ministry of Railways and Ors.

Azam Aslam Tamboli Vs the Chief Officer and Anr.

Shri. B. N. Chauhan Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Dhq and Ors.

Abhishek Binay Gupta Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Sec. Tribal Devel. Dept. and Anr.