Petitioners sought leave to withdraw writ petitions as they had secured admission becoming petitions infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
90 5 & 906.WP7069_2021.DOC
2023:BHC-AS:33601-DB
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7069 OF 2021
Tejal Dattatraya Kulkarni & Anr. … Petitioners
Versus
Union of India, through Secretary, Minister of …Respondents Home Affairs & Ors.
WITH
Shrivallabh Niranjan Pol … Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through Secretary, Minister of …Respondents Home Affairs & Ors.
WITH
Arushi Kumar, through Father and Natural … Petitioner Guardian Mr. Ravinder Kumar
Versus
Union of India, through Secretary, Minister of …Respondents Home Affairs & Ors.
Mr. Anilkumar K. Patil for the petitioners.
Mr. Rui Rodriques a/w. Mr. A.R. Gole for respondent no 1 and 2 in WP/ 10050/2022.
Mr. Rui Rodriques a/w. Mr. D.P. Singh for respondent no 1 and 2 in WP/ 7069/2021 & WP/7075/2021.
Mr. Rui Rodriques for respondent no. 3.
_______________________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATED: 03 November, 2023
Page 1 of 2 03 November, 2023
90 5 & 906.WP7069_2021.DOC
P.C.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.)
(G. S. KULKARNI , J.)
Page 2 of 2 03 November, 2023
Tejal Dattatraya Kulkarni & Anr.
Union of India
G. S. KULKARNI
JITENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
