The Court allowed the Plaintiff's request to withdraw Summary Suit No. 1149 of 1998, with orders for refund of court fees as per rules.
Suit disposed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 33 ss 1149-98-os.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1149 OF 1998
M/sDattatraya Trading Company… Plaintiff
Vs.
J. Kimatrai and Company and anr.… Defendants
Mr. Lalit V. Jain, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Amrut M. Vernekar, Advocate for the Defendant No.1.
-------
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :13 DECEMBER, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Mr. Lalit V. Jain, learned counsel appears for the Plaintiff and seeks leave
of this Court to withdraw the suit. The Plaintiff is present in Court. Mr. Amrut M.Vernekar, learned counsel for the Defendant No.1 has no objection, if the suit is
allowed to be withdrawn.
2. Accordingly, Suit is disposed as withdrawn.
3. Refund of court fees as per Rules.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Digitally signed PRIYARAJESHSOPARKAR by PRIYARAJESHSOPARKARDate:2023.12.16 15:05:17 +0530
1 of 1
Priya R. Soparkar
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court