The High Court dismissed a second appeal, relying on the decision in Second Appeal No.512 of 2022 heard on the same day, and ordered costs accordingly.
The second appeal was dismissed; no order as to cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-SA-917-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2022
Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors....Appellants
Versus
Mr. Shreedhar Singh & Anr....Respondents
Ms. Akshada Shetye i/by Ms. Prasanna Tare for the Appellants.
Mr. Vijayprakash Yadav for the Respondents.
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATE: 25th AUGUST, 2023.
P.C.
1.The Advocate for the Appellant promoter has stated that the
issue raised in this appeal is similar to the issue arising in Second Appeal
No.512 of 2022, which is also heard today and therefore order passed in
Second Appeal No.512 of 2022 would equally apply to the present appeal
being Second Appeal No.917 of 2022 is concerned.
Digitally signed by SUNNY SUNNYANKUSHRAOTHOTE ANKUSHRAOTHOTEDate:2023.09.04 16:51:51 +0530
2.Based on the above statement made by the counsel for the
Appellant and for the reasons as given in the judgment in Second Appeal
No.512 of 2022, the present appeal is also dismissed. No order as to cost.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.]
1 of 1
Sunny Thote
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Second Appeal No.512 of 2022Relied on¶8
Sanvo Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Shreedhar Singh
Jitendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court