The second appeal was allowed to be withdrawn due to an out-of-court settlement. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and the accompanying civil and interim applications were also disposed of.
The Second Appeal was allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed; Civil Application No. 373 of 2017 and Interim Application No. 444 of 2019 were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 SA 637.19.doc
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.637 OF 2019 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 373 OF 2017 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.444 OF 2019
Bajirao Shamrao Kadam …Appellant V/s.
Sangita Hanmant Nalawade & Anr. …Respondents
Mr. Kirankumar J. Phakade for the Appellant/ Applicant. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 8th June 2023
P.C.:
1. Mr. Kirankumar Phakade, learned Counsel appearing for
the Appellant states that the dispute between the parties is settled out of the Court and therefore he has instructions to withdraw the Second Appeal.
2. Accordingly the Second Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
3. In view of dismissal of the Second Appeal, nothing survives
in the Civil Application and the Interim Application and the same are also disposed of.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
1
Bajirao Shamrao Kadam
Sangita Hanmant Nalawade
Anr.
MADHAV J. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
