Review petition in an arbitration matter was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner upon seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907_RPR_1_23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2023
Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited
… Petitioner
vs.
M/s. Rapid Infra and Mining LLP
… Respondent
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 66 OF 2021
Ms. Madhavi Ayyappan, i/b. Talekar & Associates for petitioner.
Ms. Priyanka Mistry, i/b. Pankaj Purway for respondent.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2023
P.C. :
. Heard learned counsel for the parties. When this Court was not inclined to pass favourable order in the present petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the present petition.
Digitally signed byPRIYA PRIYA KAMBLI KAMBLI Date:2023.08.05 14:54:24 +0530
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Priya Kambli
1/1
Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited
M/s. Rapid Infra and Mining LLP
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
