reasonable cause. The learned advocate submitted that within three months of the marriage, the lactation to the petitioner No.1 started and, therefore, in order to ascertain the cause behind the same, the petitioner No.1 was taken to the Government Medical Hospital, Jabalpur and she was examined. The learned advocate submitted that after examination, the Medical Officer Dr. Mrs. Lele informed the respondent that before marriage, there was abortion of the petitioner No.1, therefore, there was lactation to her. The learned advocate submitted that when the parents of the petitioner No.1 were confronted with this medical opinion and questioned about the same, they quarrelled with the respondent and in order to avoid further discussion on this topic, they carried the daughterpetitioner No.1 with them and since then she has been residing with them. The learned advocate further submitted that the decree of divorce has been granted in the petition filed by the respondent on the ground of desertion. The learned advocate, therefore, submitted that the petitioner No.1 is not at all entitled to get the maintenance. The learned advocate submitted that the learned Judge of the Family Court has not properly considered the evidence about the income of the respondent as well as the income of the petitioner No.1, while granting and quantifying the maintenance. The learned advocate submitted that now the
