The petitioners filed a PIL regarding a hunger fast. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn without adjudicating the underlying facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
57.23pil
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.57 OF 2023 WITH CA/13301/2023 IN PIL/57/2023 WITH CA/13418/2023 IN PIL/57/2023 WITH CA/13416/2023 IN PIL/57/2023
NILESH BABURAO SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Mr Mahesh Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr P. P. Tayade, Advocate for Petitioner;
Mr Birendra Saraf, Advocate General for Respondents/State Mr V. D. Salunke, Senior Advocate i/b Mr V. S. Kadam with Mr Amol Chalak, Mr Y. M. Jadhav, Mr S. C. Bhosale Mr D. A. Madake, Mr U. M. Mhaske and Mr S. S. Tope, Advocates for Intervenors
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd November, 2023
PER COURT:
57.23pil (2)
5. This Public Interest Litigation is, therefore,
disposed off , as withdrawn on instructions.
57.23pil
(3)
sjk
Nilesh Baburao Shinde
The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary and others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
