Avinash Vishnupant Kale v. Union of India, Thr. Ministry of Railway, New Delhi and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 PIL-57-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Public Interest Litigation No.57 of 2023
Avinash Vishnupant Kale
Versus
Union of India and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
Shri S.G. Karmarkar, Counsel for Petitioner.
Shri S.A. Chaudhari, Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Shri S.T. Chavhan, Counsel for Intervenor in Civil Application No.1320 of 2023.
Ms Payal Gaikwad, Counsel for Intevenors in Civil Application No.1322 of 2023.
Shri A.B. Moon, Counsel for Intervenor in Civil Application No.1323 of 2023.
Shri V.P. Pantawane, Counsel for Intevenor in Civil Application No.1345 of 2023.
Shri S.R. Narnaware, Counsel for Intervenor in Civil Application No.1338 of 2023.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 25th OCTOBER, 2023 .
In view of the reply filed by the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager on
behalf of the respondents indicating the arrangements made to clear the rush of
the passengers on 24-10-2023 and 25-10-2023, no further orders are required to
be passed in the present proceedings. The same are accordingly disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
LANJEWAR
Avinash Vishnupant Kale
Union of India
A. S. Chandurkar
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court