The petitioner was directed to permit withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation No. 44 of 2023 with liberty to file afresh. Permission granted and Petitioner allowed to withdraw litigation.
Permission granted to withdraw PIL with liberty to file afresh and allowed to withdraw security deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed byMUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2023.10.12 16:17:35 +0530
1 15-PIL 44-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.44 OF 2023
Barkatullah Alihasan Shaikh … Petitioner V/s. Central Government of India & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sandeep Satkar for the Petitioner. Mr. D. P. Singh for Respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Anand Kulkarni for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 11th OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :
After arguing at some length, learned Counsel for the
Petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to file afresh. Permission is granted.
2. Accordingly, present Public Interest Litigation is
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
1 of 2
Mugdha
2 15-PIL 44-23.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
Mugdha
Barkatullah Alihasan Shaikh
Central Government of India
Deendrakumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
