The PIL was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court did not consider the tenability of the matter.
PIL permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.9.23-pil.docx
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ BASAVRAJ GURAPPA GURAPPA PATIL PATIL Date:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 9 OF 2023
2023.01.19 10:31:43 Saji Lyakaramuruyil Pappachan ….. Petitioner +0530 Vs.
Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Girish Godbole I/b. Mr. Hemant Ghadigaonkar for the Petitioner Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP A/W. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the State Mr. N. R. Bubna for Respondent No.4
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : JANUARY 17, 2023
P.C.
that there are some mistakes in the petition and further documents are not annexed with the matter. The learned Counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the PIL with liberty to file a fresh one.
4 The PIL is disposed of as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Basavraj
Saji Lyakaramuruyil Pappachan
Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
