This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.167.22-pil.docx
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ BASAVRAJ GURAPPA GURAPPA PATIL PATIL Date: 2023.02.09 14:02:45 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 167 OF 2022
Pushkaraj Shekherrao Indurkar ….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Bhushan U. Deshmukh for the Petitioner Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w. Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 8, 2023
P.C.
25.167.22-pil.docx
gathering people at Ganpati festivals, is rejected under order dated 2nd September 2016. For the same purpose, the second PIL would not be tenable. The Court had observed in its order dated 2nd September 2016 in PIL No.149 of 2016 that there is no mention about a particular incident.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Basavraj
Pushkaraj Shekherrao Indurkar
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
