Allowed

Harshal Bharat Mehta v. Bharat Kantilal Mehta (Deceased)

Bombay HC24 Feb 2023MPT/55/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bench allowed a miscellaneous petition seeking a Legal Heirship Certificate for a deceased who died intestate. The court found the petition in order and directed the registry to issue the certificate certifying the petitioner and other next of kin as the sole heirs.

What did the court decide?

Legal Heirship Certificate issued certifying the petitioner, his mother, and two sisters as the only heirs and legal representatives of the deceased.

Harshal Bharat Mehta Vs Bharat Kantilal Mehta… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

MUGDHAM Digitallysigned byMUGDHAMPARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date:2023.02.2712:20:28+0530

¶2

1 12-MPT 55-23.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.55 OF 2023

¶4

Bharat Kantilal Mehta … Deceased

¶5

Harshal Bharat Mehta … Petitioner

¶6

Ms. Sujata Babar for the Petitioner.

¶7

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY 2023

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

The Petitioner seeks the grant of a Legal Heirship Certificate under the provisions of Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 in respect of one Bharat Kantilal Mehta (‘the deceased’), who died in Mumbai on 24/06/2020. A copy of the death certificate is annexed to the Miscellaneous Petition. It is stated that despite due and diligent search, no Will of the deceased has been found. It is therefore assumed that the deceased died intestate.

¶10

The persons mentioned in the table in Paragraph 4 are the only legal heirs and next of kin of the deceased according to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, by which the deceased was governed at the time of his death.

Mugdha

1 of 3

2 12-MPT 55-23.doc

The reason, for which the Legal Heirship Certificate is required, is set out in paragraph 9 of the Miscellaneous Petition.

¶15

The requisite consent affidavits of the other legal heirs are annexed to the Petition.

¶16

No other Petition for Legal Heirship Certificate, Succession Certificate, Probate or Letters of Administration with or without Will annexed has been filed. Therefore, there is no impediment in law to the grant of relief.

¶17

I have heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as well as perused the said Petition. I find that the same is in order and deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice.

¶18

The Miscellaneous Petition is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under :-

¶19

“ a) That Legal Heirship Certificate be issued Certifying that the Petitioner, his Mother and Two Sisters are the only Heirs and Legal Representatives of the Deceased under the provision of Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827; mentioned details in Para No.8”

Mugdha

2 of 3

3 12-MPT 55-23.doc

The Registry shall issue the Legal Heirship Certificate in the standard format prescribed for the same.

¶24

The Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall

¶25

be no order as to costs.

¶26

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶27

Mugdha

¶28

3 of 3

Harshal Bharat Mehta v. Bharat Kantilal Mehta (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harshal Bharat Mehta v. Bharat Kantilal Mehta (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harmony Dezigns and Structures LLP through Its Partners Abbas Khambaty Vs Brijesh Mohan Hari and Anr.

Harmony Dezigns and Structures LLP through Its Partners Abbas Khambaty Vs Brijesh Mohan Hari and Anr.

Usha D Shah vs Mantri Realty Limited

Mahipat G. Indalkar Vs Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies and Anr.

Tushar Dwardadas Thakkar Vs Haridas Dwardadas Thakkar Deceased

Manuel Francis Govlas Vs Xavier Louis D'Souza