Allowed

Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat v. Siddharth Popat Kharat(Deceased)

Bombay HC9 Jun 2023MPT/156/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Bombay allowed a miscellaneous petition seeking issuance of a legal heirship certificate for the deceased Siddharth Popat Kharat. The court certified the petitioners as legal heirs and disposed of the matter without a proclamation.

What did the court decide?

Issuance of Legal Heirship Certificate certifying Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat and Nikitesh Siddharth Kharat as legal heirs of the deceased.

Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat Vs Siddharth Popat… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

16.mtp.156.23.doc

¶2

Ajay

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶4

MISC. PETITION NO. 156 OF 2023

¶5

Siddharth Popat Kharat..Deceased

¶6

Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat and Anr...Petitioners

¶7

Mr. Prabhu Velar, Advocate for Petitioners.

¶8

CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:JUNE 09, 2023.

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. Heard Mr. Velar, learned Advocate for Petitioners.

¶11

2. Present Misc. Petition is filed by the Petitioners for issuance

¶12

of legal heirship certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation

¶13

VIII of 1827 in respect of deceased Siddharth Popat Kharat. Deceased
Siddharth P. Kharat is survived by two sons i.e. Kamlesh Kharat and
Nikitesh Siddharth Kharat. The names of the legal heirs of deceased in
paragraph No.4 of the Petition.

¶14

3. Purpose for filing the present Petition is in paragraph No.6 which reads thus:-

¶15

“6. The heirship is required for transfer the assets shown in the schedule of Assets standing in the name of the Petitioners and to submit it before MHADA & Cooperative Housing societies. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit – D is the Schedule of Assets.”

¶16

1 of 2

¶17

16.mtp.156.23.doc

¶18

4. In view of the above, Misc. Petition stands allowed in terms

¶19

of prayer clause (a) which reads thus:-

¶20

“a. This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Legal Heirship Certificate to the petitioners under the provision of Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 certifying that Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat (Son) and Nikitesh Siddharth Kharat (Son) as the legal heirs of the deceased i.e. Siddharth Popat Kharat.”

¶21

5. Misc. Petition is disposed.

¶22

6. Issuance of proclamation is dispensed with.

¶23

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

¶24

Ajay

¶25

2 of 2

Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat v. Siddharth Popat Kharat(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Siddharth Kharat v. Siddharth Popat Kharat(Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramila Krishna Mulki Vs Nandkumar Krishna Mulki Alias Nandkumar K Mulki Alias Nandkumar K Mulaki (Deceased)

Nikhil Gopal Waghela Vs Gopal Manga Waghela (Deceased)

Satyanarayan Baijnath Yadav Vs Baijnath Govindram Yadav

Krishna Ramchandra Shikhare Vs Shikhare Savitrabai Ramchandra (Deceased)

Abhijeet Sudheendra Chikkerur Vs Sudheendra Dheerendra Chikkerur

Shanti and Santosh Builders vs the State of Maharashtra