The High Court disposed of the miscellaneous civil application as infructuous because the restitution of conjugal rights petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-MCA-64-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2020
YOGITA MAHESH KEDAR @ SHIRKE C/O SUNANDA DATTATRAYA SHIRKE
)...APPLICANT
V/s.
MAHESH DILIP KEDAR
)...RESPONDENT
Mr. H. D. Chavan, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Mahesh D. Kedar, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:1st DECEMBER, 2023.
P.C.:
1. When the matter is called out, Mr. H. D. Chavan, learned counsel
for the Applicant submits that the restitution of conjugal rights petition
filed by the Respondent-husband has been withdrawn and therefore,
nothing survives in this application.
2. The Application stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Priya Soparkar 1/1
Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2023.12.01 18:10:10 +0530
Yogita Mahesh Kedar @ Shirke
Mahesh Dilip Kedar
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court