Shalu Sumeet Singh v. Sumeet Rajesh Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
A miscellaneous civil application was disposed of as infructuous on the ground that the respondent had died before the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 175.MCA-50-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 50 OF 2019
SHALU SUMEET SINGH
VERSUS
SUMEET RAJESH SINGH
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.R. Gaikwad
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.A. Menezes
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 4th DECEMBER 2023.
Per Court :
. Heard.1.This application has become infructuous as the respondent died.
The application is disposed of as infructuous.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]
Najee b .
Shalu Sumeet Singh
Sumeet Rajesh Singh
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court