Allowed

Smt. Rekha W/O Sanjay Khandekar v. Shri Sanjay Ishwardas Khandekar

Bombay HC4 Dec 2023MCA/431/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for transfer of divorce proceedings from District Judge Akola to Family Court Nagpur. Court allowed transfer due to medical grounds and distance, permitting respondent to appear via video conference.

What did the court decide?

Divorce Petition No.6/2018 withdrawn from Akola and transferred to Family Court No.2, Nagpur Respondent permitted video conference appearances.

Smt. Rekha W/O Sanjay Khandekar Vs Shri Sanjay… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 36 mca 431-2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR.) NO. 431/2023

¶4

Smt. Rekha w/o Sanjay Khandekar Vs.

¶5

Shri Sanjay Ishwardas Khandekar

¶6

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

¶9

Shri G.G. Bade, Advocate for applicant Shri B.K. Suchak, Advocate for respondent

¶10

CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J. DATED : 04/12/2023

¶11

Heard learned Counsel for applicant as well as non-applicant. The present application is filed by applicant/wife for transfer of Divorce Petition No.6/2018 pending on the file of learned District Judge, Akola.

¶12

The applicant is legally wedded wife of non-applicant. Their marriage came to be performed on 12/12/2004. It is her contention that due to ill treatment by the non-applicant, she was constrained to leave her matrimonial house and started to reside at Nagpur.

¶13

The distance between Akola to Nagpur is around 250 km. There is execution proceeding

¶14

2 36 mca 431-2023

¶15

bearing No.48/2022 pending at Nagpur. As such, there is no any inconvenience going to cause to the non-applicant. Moreover, applicant has filed certificate on record having some Hypertensive Heart Disease. As such, she requested that it is not possible to attend the proceedings at Akola. As such, considering the medical ground placed by the applicant and considering distance between Akola to Nagpur, it would be appropriate to transfer proceeding pending at Akola to Nagpur.

¶16

The learned Counsel for non-applicant vehemently submitted that it would not possible to attend each date. As such, he is permitted to appear through video conference except the dates on which his personal presence is required by the Court. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following order:

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

i) The application is allowed. ii) The proceeding i.e. Divorce Petition No.6/2018 pending on the file of learned District Judge, Akola is hereby withdrawn and transferred to Family Court No.2, Nagpur.

¶19

iii) The learned Principal District and

¶20

3 36 mca 431-2023

¶21

Sessions Judge, Akola is requested to facilitate the transfer.

¶22

iv) The respondent is at liberty to appear through video conference except the dates on which his personal presence is required by the Court.

¶23

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

JUDGE

¶25

R.S. Sahare

Smt. Rekha W/O Sanjay Khandekar v. Shri Sanjay Ishwardas Khandekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rekha W/O Sanjay Khandekar v. Shri Sanjay Ishwardas Khandekar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintaman S/O Ramaji Gahukar Vs Ramesh Ganpat Manusmare and Another

Eknath S/O Laxman Gawande (Dead) Chandrabhaga Wd/O Eknath Gawande and Others Vs Babarao S/O Vithalrao Jadhao

Eknath S/O Laxman Gawande (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Chandrabhaga Wd/O Eknath Gawande and Others Vs Babarao S/O Vithalrao Jadhao

Kailash Pralhad Chavan Vs Shrirang Gobra Jadhao

Sau. Nilmani W/O Vijay Hivrale vs the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati and Another

Nipun S/O. Nirmalchand Kothari vs Ekta Nipun Kothari