Disposed
Sau Neha Niket Pokhrana v. Shri. Niket Rajendra Pokhrana
Bombay HCMCA/41/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
41-22-c.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 21 mca 41-22-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.41 OF 2022
Sau. Neha Niket Pokhrana … Applicant
Vs.
Shri. Niket Rajendra Pokhrana … Respondent
Mr.Siddharth Karpe, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Pranav H. Bhoite, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :05 OCTOBER, 2023.
P.C. :
1. When the matter is called out, both the learned counsel submit that in the underlying dispute decree of divorce by mutual consent has already been passed and as such, the application has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
1 of 1
Priya R. Soparkar
Neha Niket Pokhrana
Niket Rajendra Pokhrana
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court