Pratibha Prashant Dhole v. Prashant Hanumant Dhole
Case brief
What is this about?
257-23-c.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 29 mca 257-23-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.257 OF 2023
Pratibha Prashant Dhole… Applicant
Vs.
Prashant Hanumant Dhole… Respondent
Ms. Savita Yadav, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Roshan Hule i/by Mr. Robin Thomas, Advocates for the Respondent.
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :22 DECEMBER, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Ms. Savita Yadav, learned counsel appears for the Applicant and
submits that in the Lower Court the divorce proceedings have been heard
and the matter has been kept for judgment and therefore, this application
has become infructuous. Mr. Roshan Hule, learned counsel for the
Respondent agrees with the submissions made on behalf of the Applicant.
2. Accordingly, the application stands disposed as infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pratibha Prashant Dhole
- respondent
Prashant Hanumant Dhole
Coram
Abhay Ahuja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court