This order dismissed a Miscellaneous Civil Application listed for dismissal due to the applicant's absence despite permission to appear in-person. The court observed the applicant was likely not serious about pursuing the application, leading to the dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:26634
1 11 mca 231-22-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.231 OF 2022
Siddharth Suhas Bhagat… Applicant
Vs.
Bimal @ Bimalkumar Mannulal Agarwal … Respondent
Applicant in-person is absent.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :12 SEPTEMBER, 2023.
P.C.:
1. On 28th August, 2023, the following order was passed :-
“1. Applicant is absent, although he has been permitted to
appear in-person.
2.The office remark indicates that the application is under
office objection.
3.It appears that the Applicant is not serious about
pursuing the application.
4. Accordingly, list on 12th September, 2023, for dismissal.”
2. Today this matter has been listed for dismissal. Again neither the Applicant nor anyone appears for the Applicant.
3. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Priya R. Soparkar
1 of 1
Siddharth Suhas Bhagat
Bimal @ Bimalkumar Mannulal Agarwal
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court