This order allowed an application for the return of records in a special civil suit to the trial court, noting the expiry of two respondent parties.
Allowed application for return of records in Special Civil Suit No. 14/2013/A to the Senior Civil Judge & CJM Court at Panaji.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA 225 of 2023
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2023 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.3 OF 2023
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2023 MOHAN NAMDEV USKAIKAR AND ANR ... APPLICANTS Versus
MALINI MAVLI USKAIKAR AND 17 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.3 OF 2023
MALINI MAULI USKAIKAR AND 8 ORS ... APPELLANTS Versus
MOHAN NAMDEV USKAIKAR AND 10 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Raunaq Kantak, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. N. Shirodkar, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM:- M. S. KARNIK, J. DATED :- 4th July, 2023
P.C.
Heard.
Page 1 of 2
4th July, 2023
MCA 225 of 2023
17 herein i.e. Laxmi Shrikant Naik and Shrikant Narayan Naik have expired without any issue.
M. S. KARNIK, J.
Digitally signed by ANDREZA
ANDREZA PEREIRA PEREIRA Date: 2023.07.05 16:51:44 +05'30'
Page 2 of 2
4th July, 2023
MOHAN NAMDEV USKAIKAR AND ANR
MALINI MAVLI USKAIKAR AND 17 ORS
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
