Disposed
Achita Aditya Rane v. Mr. Aditya Anil Rane
Bombay HCMCA/193/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application transferred for settlement deemed infructuous post-resolution; disposed.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20. MCA 193-22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 193 OF 2022
Achita Aditya Rane… Applicant
V/s.
Aditya Anil Rane… Respondent
Ms. Gauri Velankar for the Applicant.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:12th October, 2023
P.C. :
1. When the matter is called out, Ms. Velankar, learned Counsel for
the Applicant submits that the Marriage Petition that was sought to be
transferred has been settled and therefore, this application has become
infructuous.
2. Accordingly, application stands disposed as infructuous.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
Nikita Gadgil 1/1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Achita Aditya Rane
Aditya Anil Rane
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court