Disposed

Suresh Vinayak Raikar and 14 Ors., v. Janardan Pandu Madkaikar and 106 Ors.

Bombay HC24 Feb 2023MCA/168/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Misc. Civil Applications seeking correction of respondent names, condonation of delay, and leave to implead legal representatives were disposed of after amendments were allowed and sufficient cause for delay was accepted.

What did the court decide?

Corrections to respondent names allowed; delay condoned; abatement set aside; leave granted to implead legal representatives.

Suresh Vinayak Raikar and 14 Ors., Vs Janardan… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

10-MCAS IN SA-73-09.DOC

¶2

Suchitra

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶4

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATIONS NO.173, 168, 174, 172, 170, 169, 522, 523, 517 AND 171/2015, STA NO.3122 & 2354/2010 (F)

¶5

WITH

¶6

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.638/2010 IN

¶7

STA NO.2354/2010 (F) WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.214/2011 IN

¶8

STA NO.3122/2010 (F) IN SECOND APPEAL NO.73/2009

¶9

SHRI. SURESH VINAYAK RAIKAR AND ANR.

¶10

… APPELLANTS

¶11

Versus

¶12

SHRI. JANARDAN PANDU MADKAIKAR AND 106 ORS. … RESPONDENTS

¶13

Mr K. Kavlekar, Advocate for the Appellants/Applicants.

¶14

Mr Ashwin Bhobe with Ms Annelise Fernandes, Advocate for the Respondent No.70.

¶15

CORAM: M. S. SONAK, J.

¶16

DATED: 24^th February 2023

¶17

P.C.:

¶18

1. The applicants apply for correction of names of some of

¶19

the respondents. Without prejudice to the rights and contentions

¶20

Page 1 of 2 24^th February 2023

¶21

10-MCAS IN SA-73-09.DOC

¶22

of the respondents such application is allowed. Necessary
corrections to be carried out within four weeks from today.

¶23

2. The remaining civil applications seek condonation of delay, setting aside of abatement if any and leave to bring on record the legal representatives of some of the deceased respondents. Sufficient cause has been shown. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Abatement is set aside. Leave is granted to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondents.

¶24

3. Mr Kavlekar states that necessary amendments will be carried out within four weeks from today.

¶25

4. Misc. Civil Applications are disposed of.

¶26

M. S. SONAK, J.

¶27

SUCHITRA Digitally signed by SUCHITRA NANDAN NANDAN SINGBAL SINGBAL Date: 2023.02.24 17:11:37 +05'30'

¶28

Page 2 of 2 24^th February 2023

Suresh Vinayak Raikar and 14 Ors., v. Janardan Pandu Madkaikar and 106 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Vinayak Raikar and 14 Ors., v. Janardan Pandu Madkaikar and 106 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Coastal Builders, Rep. by Its Prop., Vishwas Dessai and Anr., Vs Bharat Developers and Realtors Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Director, Pradip Singh Birring.

Resources International, Rep. by Its Partner, Dipak M. Rajani Vs John Fillipe Costa and 2 Ors.

Mary Pereira, Rep. by Her Poa by Menino Pereira and 6 Ors., Vs Anant Vengurlekar @ Babi Vengurlekar (Dec) Rep. by His Lrs.

Prabhu Rockshape Machinery Pvt.,Ltd., Thr, Its Director Sidharam Prabhuchitte Vs S. Chems and Allied Producers Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Auth Sign. Rajesh Maheshwari

Prabhu Rockshape Machinery Pvt. Ltd., Thr, Its Director Sidharam Prabhuchitte Vs S. Chems and Allied Producers Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Its Auth Sign. Rajesh Maheshwari

Suresh Vinayak Raikar and Anr., Vs Janardan Pandu Madkaikar and 106 Ors.