Rajalakshmi Amudan Swamy v. Amudan Krishna Swamy(Deceased)
Bombay HCJOT/129/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Judge's order accepting backing separately. No substantive reasoning or decision provided in this judgment text.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
3_JOT129_23.doc
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
¶3
JUDGE’S ORDER NO.129 OF 2023
¶4
IN
¶5
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.1025 OF 2013
¶6
Amudan Krishna Swamy … Deceased Rajalakshmi Amudan Swamy … Petitioner
¶7
Ms. Gulestan M. Dubash for Petitioner.
¶8
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 05, 2023
¶9
P.C. :
¶10
Judge’s order is accepted and signed separately.
¶11
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
¶12
Minal Parab
¶13
PRIYA Digitallysigned byPRIYAKAMBLI KAMBLI Date:2023.09.0711:22:43+0530
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Rajalakshmi Amudan Swamy
Coram
AI extract
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court