Dismissed
Mukundan Raman v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCIA/610/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IA-610-23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 22 IA-610-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.610 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.987 OF 2018
Mukundan Raman
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ganesh Bhujbal i/b B.D.Shinde for the Applicant.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra, A.P.P. for the State.
Ms.Neha Maru i/b Mr.Kuldeep Patil for the Respondent No.2/CBI.
Mr.D.P.Singh for the Respondent No.3/Passport Authority.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 13th MARCH, 2023
P.C:-
In the wake of the aforesaid policy, the learned counsel states that since the passport of the Applicant has expired in
M.M.Salgaonkar
2/2 22 IA-610-23.odt
November 2022, the Applicant is duty bound to make an application, seeking re-issuance of the passport, instead of seeking renewal of passport.
Upon such an application being made, the Passport Authority is expected to decide it on merits, in accordance with law.
M.M.Salgaonkar
Mukundan Raman
The State of Maharashtra
BHARATI DANGRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court