A single judge allowed an interim application and restored a criminal application to the file without citing specific grounds or detailed reasoning.
Application allowed; Criminal Application No.426 of 2019 restored to file; Interim application disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
63-IA-58-2020-appp-426-2019.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 58 OF 2020 IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 426 OF 2019
Kiran Vasant Pawar
....Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Afsar Ansari, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 6th OCTOBER, 2023.
P.C. :
applicant, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and Criminal Application No.426 of 2019 is restored to file.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2023.10.07 11:48:59 +0530
Kiran Vasant Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
