Single judge allowed an interim application to condone a 21-day delay in filing a first appeal, satisfied that grounds were made out after hearing both sides and reviewing affidavit evidence regarding service.
Interim Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) to condone the delay of 21 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
936-IA-4719-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4719 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.10504 OF 2023
Anil Maruti Dhavan ...Applicant Versus Babaso Chhaganrao Shinde And Ors. ...Respondents ____________________________________
Ms. Sangita Choure for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Rahul Kadam for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 8 NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C.:
Digitally signed SUNNYANKUSHRAO by SUNNYANKUSHRAOTHOTE THOTE Date: 2023.11.09 09:56:44 +0530
1
Sunny Thote
936-IA-4719-2023.doc
been received by one family member of Respondent No.1. Therefore, according to her service has been effected on all the Respondents.
clause (a).
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Sunny Thote
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 21 days in filing the first appeal should be condoned.
Anil Maruti Dhavan
Babaso Chhaganrao Shinde
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
