The court allowed an interim application for condonation of 110 days delay in filing a criminal appeal, finding the cause for delay bonafide. Notices were issued to respondents, which were waived by relevant authorities.
Interim Application No. 46 of 2020 allowed; Notice issued to respondent no.4 returnable on 7/11/2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 45 IA-46-20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 46 OF 2020 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 22 OF 2020
Santosh Ananda Mane .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors .. Respondents
Mr.Ghanasham Jadhav for applicant. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State. Mr. Kuldeep Patil i/b Ms. Saili Dhuru, for respondent no.2.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 10th OCTOBER, 2023
P.C:-
Interim Application No. 46 of 2020
1 The application filed in appeal seek condonation of 110 days delay in filing the appeal.
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel Mr. Patil for respondent no.2.
On perusal of the application, it is evident that the applicant was informed that the proposal has been forwarded to the Law and Judiciary department by the Additional Public Prosecutor but the same being rejected and this left him with no other option then to present the appeal himself.
Finding the cause for the delay in filing the appeal to be justified one and bonafide, I deem it appropriate to condone the
Ashish
2/2 45 IA-46-20.doc
same.
Interim Application 46 of 2020 stands allowed.
Appeal (St) No. 22 of 2020
2 Issue notice to the respondent no.4, the notice is made returnable on 7/11/2023, the notice is permitted to be served through Hamdast as well as by private service.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a 110-day delay in filing an appeal against a proposal rejection.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Ananda Mane
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.4
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
