Allowed

Ila Navin Rathod and 2 Others v. Navin Bechardas Rathod and 6 Others

Bombay HC28 Mar 2023IA/4299/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an Interim Application amending a Testamentary Petition for Probate into a Petition for Letters of Administration following the death of the sole executor, permitting the legal heirs to replace the deceased petitioner with consequential amendments.

What did the court decide?

Permission to amend the Testamentary Petition for Probate into a Petition for Letters of Administration with Will annexed was granted.

Ila Navin Rathod and 2 Others Vs Navin Bechardas… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.03.29 17:03:14 +0530

¶2

1 (912) IA-4299.22.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4299 OF 2022

¶5

¶6

TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.44 OF 1996

¶7

¶8

TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.383 OF 1996

¶9

Ila Navin Rathod and ors. : Applicants. In the matter between Navin Bechardas Rathod (Now Deceased) : Petitioner. Versus Gangaben Bechardas Rathod (Since deceased) and others : Respondents. And Ila Navin Rathod & ors. : Proposed Petitioners.

¶10

Ms.Dhanashree Hublikar i/by Mr. Yogendra M Kanchan for the Applicants. Ms. Nilima Cosarvagod i/by Mr. S U Pandey for Respondent Nos.2, 3(a) & 3(b).

¶11

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 28th MARCH 2023

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

1 The present Interim Application seeks to amend Petition No.383 of 1996.

¶14

1 of 3

¶15

LGC

¶16

2 (912) IA-4299.22.doc

¶17

2 Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicants submits

¶18

that Applicants are the wife and children of the deceased Petitioner. She submits that the Petitioner – Navin Bechardas Rathod has passed way on 18 th March 2022 leaving behind him the Applicants as his only legal heirs and next of kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956. It is thus that the present Interim Application has been filed.

¶19

3 Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.2, 3(a) and 3(b) does not oppose the amendment.

¶20

4 However the Court noticed that the present Petition is one for Probate of the last Will and Testament of one Bechardas Karsandas Rathod who died on 27th July 1983. The Petitioner was the sole executor of the said Will of the deceased. Given this, it was put to Learned Counsel for the Applicants that the Petition for Probate would not be maintainable as the sole executor under the Will has passed away.

¶21

5 Learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that on the Application for amendment being allowed, the Applicants would take steps to convert Testamentary Petition No.383 of 1996 into a Petition for Letters of

¶22

2 of 3

¶23

LGC

¶24

3 (912) IA-4299.22.doc

¶25

Administration with Will annexed.

¶26

6 In view thereof, I find no impediment in allowing the present Interim Application. The present Interim Application is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) which read as under :-

¶27

“(a) That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit/allow the Applicants to amend the Petition and bring the Legal Heirs of the Deceased Petitioner on record as Proposed Petitioner Nos.1(a) to 1(c) in the above matter in place of the Deceased Petitioner as shown in the Schedule herein;

¶28

(b) Consequential amendments be allowed.”

¶29

7 Learned Counsel for the Applicants is permitted to effect necessary amendment to convert Testamentary Petition No.383 of 1996 for Probate into a Petition for Letters of Administration within a period of two weeks from today.

¶30

8 The present Interim Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶31

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶32

3 of 3

¶33

LGC

Ila Navin Rathod and 2 Others v. Navin Bechardas Rathod and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ila Navin Rathod and 2 Others v. Navin Bechardas Rathod and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rukmini Mahadeo Walke Vs Mahadeo Vishnu Walke

Nitai Madhusudan Mehta Vs Gopi Madhusudan Mehta @ Gopi Madhu Mehta

Kersi @ Kershasp Divecha Vs Tehmi Divecha @ Temhi Jamshed Divecha @ Tehmi Jamshed Devcha (Deceased)

Phonographic Performance Limited vs Rohan Ashok Nimhan

Aditya Birla Finance Limited vs Rnp Tradex LLP

Anthony George Dsouza and 2 Ors. Vs Maria Dsouza (Plaintiff) and Gladys Francis Dsouza (Def) and Dulcine Dsouza (Deceased)