The Bombay High Court dismissed interim applications stating they do not survive a prior order directing the final hearing listing of the underlying criminal appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 59-ia4676.22gp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4676 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4277 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 429 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 166 OF 2020
Sumankumar Nandkumar Jha
…..Applicant
Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra
…..Respondent
Mr. A. R. Avachat a/w S.H. Deshpande appointed Advocate for the Applicant.
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Kartik Garg, Appointed Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 13th APRIL, 2023.
P.C.:-
By an Order dated 18th November, 2022 passed in Criminal Appeal No.166 of 2020, this Court has directed the Registry to list the Appeal on final hearing board as per its own turn.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Sumankumar Nandkumar Jha
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
