Allowed

Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh v. Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh (Petitioner) and Ram Narayan Shitla Prasad Singh (Deceased)

Bombay HC2 Jan 2023IA/3908/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim application regarding a copyright caveat, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the application and condoned an 114-day delay in filing the supporting affidavit. The delay was accepted based on a subsequently submitted medical certificate proving the caveator's ill health prevented travel to Mumbai.

What did the court decide?

Interim application allowed; 114 days delay in filing affidavit in support of caveat condoned.

Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Digitally signed by MUGDHA M MUGDHA M PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2023.01.03 14:45:00 +0530

¶2

1 24-IA 3908-22 in CTSL 6177-22.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3908 OF 2022

¶4

¶5

CAVEAT (ST) NO.6177 OF 2022

¶6

Ram Narayan Shitla Prasad Singh … Deceased Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh … Applicant In the matter between Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh … Cavratee/Plaintiff V/s. Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh … Caveator/Defendant

¶7

Ms. Swati D. Sawant for the Applicant.

¶8

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶9

DATE : 02ND JANUARY 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

By the present Interim Application, the Applicant seeks

¶12

condonation of delay for a period of 114 days in filing the affidavit in support of the Caveat.

¶13

Since, there was no medical certificate/proof of caveator being medically unfit annexed to the Interim Application, by an order dated 05/12/2022, the learned Counsel for the Caveator was directed to file an

¶14

Mugdha

¶15

1 of 2

¶16

2 24-IA 3908-22 in CTSL 6177-22.doc

¶17

Affidavit explaining as to why the Applicant was unable to travel to Mumbai in March, 2022 on account of his ill health. The learned Counsel for the Applicant had then sought time to file the Additional Affidavit on record with a requisite medical certificate/proof evidencing the Applicant’s inability to travel.

¶18

Pursuant to the direction given in the order dated 05/12/2022, today the Applicant has filed an Affidavit dated 07/12/2022 annexing the medical certificate dated 07/03/2022, issued by Dr. C. L. Singh, B. M. S., Asthbhuja Nagar, Chauraha, Pratapgarh (U.P.), certifying that the Caveator was suffering from high fever and was advised not to travel for two-three weeks.

¶19

In light of this, the delay is condoned. The present Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

¶20

The Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

Mugdha

¶22

2 of 2

Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh v. Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh (Petitioner) and Ram Narayan Shitla Prasad Singh (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dev Narayan Shitlaprasad Singh v. Meetaba Ramnarayan Singh (Petitioner) and Ram Narayan Shitla Prasad Singh (Deceased)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Balkrishna Shinde Vs Pandharinath Shankar Poyekar

Sheenaz Dastur(Plaintiff NO.1) Vs Hormazd Noshir Dastur(Plaintiff NO.2)

Prathmesh Satish More Vs Satish Shivaji More (Deceased)

Ratnakar Jayaram Shetty Vs Shetty Jayram @ Jayaram Thimappa Shetty @ Shetty Jayaram Thimappa (Deceased)

Jiten Navinchandra Shah Vs Navinchandra Keshavji Shah Alias Navinchandra K Shah(Deceased)

Bhuvneshwarikumari Jadeja Alias Bhuvnashwrikumari Girirajsinh Jadeja Vs Giriraj Sinhji Shivraj Sinhji Jadeja Alias Girirajsinh Shivrajsinhji Jadeja (Deceased)