The court considered an interim application for condonation of delay of 72 days in filing an appeal. The application was allowed and disposed of, directing the registry to number the appeal.
Delay of 72 days in filing the appeal was condoned; application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50-ia-3800-2023-fast-9325-2023.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3800 OF 2023 IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 9325 OF 2023
Divisional Manager, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nashik Division. ….Applicant/ Appellant
Versus
Indu Sharad Avhad and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Ansari F. Ahmed i/b. Mr. Amit A. Gharte, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.
Mr. Pritesh K. Bohade, Advocate for Respondents.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2023.
P.C. :
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2023.11.30 10:22:53 +0530
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 72 days in filing the appeal can be condoned.
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed.
Divisional Manager, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nashik Division
Indu Sharad Avhad and ors.
SHIVKUMAR DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
